IAM for the Agentic Era

The Identity Context Layer
AI Agents Need

"Grant Sarah access." But which Sarah? IdentityRM gives AI agents the context to decide correctly—and the audit trail to prove it.

Patent Pending • MCP Native • SOC 2 Ready

AI Agent Request → IdentityRM Resolution "Grant Sarah the Developer role" AI Request 1 47 users named "Sarah" Traditional IdP returns all 47. Good luck. 47 matches 2 Agent persona: Engineering/Seattle Agent can only see users in its subtree. 47 → 3 sarah.williams@acme.com Confidence: 0.95 • Platform Team • In agent's scope CONFIDENCE 95% Resolved. Authorized. Logged. The right Sarah. Within scope. Provably. 52ms latency 100% audited PROOF
"

We were building custom RBAC for every AI integration. IdentityRM gave us a single control plane. Our security team finally sleeps at night.

JR
James Richardson
VP of Engineering, Series B Fintech
WHY NOW

AI Agents Are Deploying. Governance Isn't.

73%

of enterprises will deploy AI agents by 2026

Gartner predicts autonomous AI in every workflow.

Most have no governance plan.

$4.2M

average cost of an identity-related breach

AI amplifies risk. One misconfigured agent

can grant access to thousands.

MCP

is becoming the standard for AI tools

Anthropic's Model Context Protocol is how

AI agents will interact with enterprise systems.

THE WINDOW

Companies building AI governance now will lead. Everyone else will scramble to catch up.

AGENT GUARDRAILS

Agents Can't See What They Can't Access

Persona boundaries make out-of-scope entities invisible—not just inaccessible.

Agent Persona: Engineering/Seattle
Corporate (invisible) Engineering Seattle ← Agent persona root Platform Team ✓ Infrastructure ✓ Finance (invisible) London (invisible)
Why This Matters

No Over-Privileged Agents

Agent managing Engineering/Seattle can't accidentally touch Finance or London. They don't exist in its world.

Zero Enumeration Attacks

A compromised agent can't probe for what exists. "User not found" ≠ "Access denied." It's truly invisible.

Delegated Admin Without Risk

Regional managers get AI agents that manage their region. Not yours. Not corporate. Just their subtree.

Persona Switching

Same agent, different contexts. Switch from "Store A" to "Store B" mode—permissions adjust instantly.

THE IDENTITY CONTEXT LAYER

Four Questions Every AI Agent Needs Answered

Before your AI can act, it needs context. We provide it.

1
IDENTITY RESOLUTION

"Which Sarah?"

Your agent says "Sarah." We know which one.

Natural language resolution with confidence scoring. "Sarah from Platform" → sarah.williams@acme.com (0.95)

2
OWNERSHIP & HIERARCHY

"Who owns this?"

Queryable org graph, not spreadsheets.

Unlimited hierarchy depth. Corporate → Region → Franchise. Managers manage their subtree. No one else's.

3
TEMPORAL STATE

"What access existed then?"

Time-travel queries. Point-in-time reconstruction.

Auditor asks: "Who had admin access March 15th at 3 PM?" You answer in seconds, not weeks.

4
DECISION TRACES

"Why did the AI decide that?"

Every AI decision. Auditable. Queryable.

Not just what happened—why. Which factors. What checks. MCP tools for scoped audit queries.

DECISION TRACES

Other Platforms Log Actions.

We Log Reasoning.

What We Capture

Agent ID & Model Version

Which AI made this decision, on which model

Decision Mode

Autonomous vs human-approved—compliance needs this

Validation Factors

user_exists, quota_ok, policy_allows, temporal_valid

Tool Chain

Exact sequence of MCP tools invoked before decision

Correlation ID

Trace from AI request → service → database → audit

Query via MCP Tools (Scoped)

// Find risky autonomous decisions in your scope

query_audit_events(

decision_mode: "autonomous",

missing_factors: ["quota_ok"],

since: "7d"

)

PERSONA SCOPED Only your subtree

Result: 3 decisions flagged for review

AI granted access without checking quota—within your scope only

LEARNING LOOP

AI That Gets Smarter From Corrections

Every human correction becomes training data. Your IAM system improves itself.

AI
STEP 1

AI Makes Decision

"Disable user john.doe"

Reason: Suspected inactive

H
STEP 2

Human Corrects

"Re-enable user john.doe"

Reason: User is active, AI wrong

AB
STEP 3

Preference Pair

✗ Rejected: Disable without HR check

✓ Chosen: Check HR status first

DPO

Training Export

JSONL format

Fine-tune ready

Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)

State-of-the-art technique for RLHF without a separate reward model.

Every correction automatically generates training pairs you'd pay a labeling team millions to produce.

The Competitive Moat

Other platforms log corrections as separate events—no decision chain.

IdentityRM maintains: original action → correction → reason → actor type.

Your IAM system generates its own training data.

COMPARISON

The Gap in Traditional IAM

Capability
Traditional IdP
IdentityRM
Why It Matters
Hierarchy Depth
1-2 levels (flat groups)
Unlimited (N-level)
Real org structures
AI Integration
REST API + Copilot (bolted on)
60+ native MCP tools
Built for AI agents
Agent Boundaries
Role-based (can probe)
Persona-scoped (invisible)
Zero enumeration
Decision Audit
Action logs only
Full reasoning trace
Why, not just what
AI Learning
None
DPO training export
Self-improving AI
Audit Retention
30-90 days
Indefinite (snapshots)
Forensic permanence

IdPs authenticate. We contextualize. They don't know which Sarah.

"

The decision trace feature alone justified the investment. When the auditor asked 'why did the system grant this access?'—we had an answer in 30 seconds.

MK
Michelle Kim
CISO, Healthcare SaaS Platform

Ready to Govern Your AI Agents?

The identity context layer is the foundation. Everything else depends on it.

Patent Pending • 60+ MCP Tools • DPO Learning Loop • Multi-IdP

Request a Demo